(PC) Rosenblum v. Ellis, et al, No. 1:2005cv01473 - Document 64 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER Vacating 61 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Denying 63 Motion for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/26/2010. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rosenblum v. Ellis, et al Doc. 64 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP JON ROSENBLUM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C/O ELLIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:05-cv-01473 -LJO-GSA-PC ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Docs. 61, 63) 10 11 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was 12 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 13 302. 14 On July 15, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending dismissal 15 of this action for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. The recommendation was based on Plaintiff’s 16 failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with an earlier order. On July 20, 2010, 17 Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint, on which this action now proceeds. On August 20, 18 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time in which to file objections to the findings and 19 recommendations. Because Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint, the Court will vacate 20 the recommendation of dismissal. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file objections is 21 therefore moot. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The July 15, 2010, recommendation of dismissal is vacated. 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time filed on August 20, 2010, is denied as 25 moot. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com 1 Dated: 6i0kij August 26, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
