(PC) Westlake v. California Department of Corrections et al, No. 1:2005cv01293 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 12 ; ORDER Dismissing Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2008. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Westlake v. California Department of Corrections et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WESTLAKE, 12 1:05-cv-01293-LJO-DLB-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 12) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 J. WOODFORD, et al., ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 21 The matter was On April 25, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a 22 Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which 23 contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings 24 and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. 25 date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate 26 Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. 27 28 To In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 de novo review of this case. 2 entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to 3 be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. 6 Having carefully reviewed the The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 3, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 7 2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure 8 to obey the court’s order of April 25, 2007. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: b9ed48 February 3, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.