(PC) Dustin v. G.M. Galaza, et al, No. 1:2005cv00768 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER DENYING Motion 42 and ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 41 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/13/10. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Dustin v. G.M. Galaza, et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DALE OWEN DUSTIN, 10 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00768-LJO-YNP PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION v. (Doc. 42.) G. GALAZA, et al., and Defendants. ORDER VACATING RECOMMENDATIONS FINDINGS AND 14 (Doc. 41.) 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff Dale Owen Dustin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 8, 2009, Plaintiff 19 filed a pleading entitled “Memorandum of Understanding, Motion for Extension of Time Request 20 for Specific Yes or No Response in Re Return Copy.” Plaintiff’s motion requests an extension of 21 time to file his second amended complaint because he was unable to obtain copy service at his 22 prison. Plaintiff was granted an extension of time and filed his second amended complaint on 23 October 26, 2009. (Docs. #44, 45.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion will be denied as moot. 24 On September 9, 2009, the Court issued a findings and recommendations recommending that 25 this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to file his second amended complaint on time. 26 (Doc. #41.) The findings and recommendations was issued before Plaintiff’s motion for an 27 extension of time appeared on the docket. Plaintiff has since filed his second amended complaint. 28 As such, the findings and recommendations will be vacated. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, filed on September 8, 2009, is DENIED as moot; and 4 2. The Court’s September 9, 2009 findings and recommendations is VACATED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: icido3 April 13, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.