Hardge v. Alameida, et al.
Filing
59
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' 39 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT; Opposition due Within 30 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/29/2010. Filing Deadline: 5/3/2010. (Bradley, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 DESHAWN HARDGE, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 ALAMEIDA, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 Plaintiff Deshawn Hardge ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil / OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00718-LJO-DLB PC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended 14 complaint filed April 14, 2006 against Defendants Adams and Ward for use of excessive force in 15 violation of the Eighth Amendment. On August 20, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiff's requests 16 for issuance of subpoena duces tecum as to Warden Ken Clark. (Doc. 52.) Clark was granted up 17 to and including December 30, 2009, in which to respond to the subpoena for documents. On 18 November 24, 2008, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 39.) That motion 19 was taken off the Court's calendar pending completion of discovery. (Doc. 52.) Discovery is 20 closed.1 21 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff is to file and serve an
22 opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed November 24, 2008, within 23 thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. Defendants will have fourteen (14) days 24 after service of the opposition in which to file and serve their reply, if any. 25 26 27 28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a
March 29, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court presumes that both parties and W a r d e n Clark complied with the discovery orders.
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
