(PC) Contreraz v. Adams, et al, No. 1:2004cv06039 - Document 57 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER VACATING 56 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Fourth 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/15/2010. (Filing Deadline: 2/18/2011.) (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Contreraz v. Adams, et al Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUETZAL CONTRERAZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 1:04-cv-06039-LJO-GSA (PC) ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF DECEMBER 10, 2010 (Doc. 56.) D. ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 55.) 17 60-DAY DEADLINE 18 ________________________________/ 19 20 21 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On December 10, 2010, the court entered findings and recommendations, 22 recommending that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. 23 (Doc. 56.) In light of the fact that Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time on December 3, 24 2010, the findings and recommendations shall be vacated. 25 26 On December 3, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion shall be granted. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations entered on December 10, 2010, are Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 VACATED; 2. 3 4 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, filed on December 3, 2010, is GRANTED; and 3. 5 Plaintiff is granted sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order in which to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss of May 17, 2010. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij December 15, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
