(PC) Saunders v. Fairman, et al, No. 1:2002cv05806 - Document 154 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 150 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Defendants Fairman, Bingham, Powers, Woods, Jennings, and Sanders without Prejudice signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/22/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Saunders v. Fairman, et al Doc. 154 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JASON SAUNDERS, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:02-CV-05806-OWW-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING DEFENDANTS FAIRMAN, BINGHAM, POWERS, WOODS, JENNINGS, AND SANDERS WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. J. W. FAIRMAN, JR., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 (DOC. 150) / 14 15 Plaintiff Jason Saunders (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 16 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff had not effected service of process on J.W. 17 Fairman, Bingham, Powers, Woods, Jennings, and Sanders. The matter was referred to a United 18 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 28, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 20 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and 21 Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Findings and 22 Recommendations on July 19, 2011. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 25 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 28, 2011, is adopted in full; and 28 2. Defendants J.W. Fairman, Bingham, Powers, Woods, Jennings, and Sanders are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 dismissed from this action without prejudice for failure to effect service of process 2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July 22, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.