Richardson v. Bryant, et al
Filing
151
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition OR Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Within Thirty Days 144 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/31/10: Deadline for Plaintiff to comply with this order is 5/5/2010.(Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij On January 28, 2010, defendant D. Ortiz ("Defendant") filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 144.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute. v. H. L. BRYANT, et al., Defendants. / PATRICK RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, 1:99-cv-06575-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 144.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 31, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
