Paul Sapan v. Marilyn Rose Thomassen, No. 8:2013cv01678 - Document 25 (C.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT MARILYN ROSE THOMASSEN dba THOMASSEN LAW GROUP by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr, in favor of Paul Sapan against Marilyn Rose Thomassen: NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that final judgment shall be and hereby is entered on the Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-reference matter as follows: 1. Statutory Damages. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the sum of Nineteen Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($9,500.00) on Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Download PDF
Paul Sapan v. Marilyn Rose Thomassen Doc. 25 JS-6 1 2 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 Case No.: SACV 13-1678 -AB (RNBx) PAUL SAPAN, Plaintiff, vs. 14 15 16 17 MARILYN ROSE THOMASSEN dba THOMASSEN LAW GROUP, an individual, [proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT MARILYN ROSE THOMASSEN dba THOMASSEN LAW GROUP Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -1- [proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com JS-6 1 2 The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that final judgment shall be and hereby is entered on the Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above- 3 reference matter as follows: 4 5 6 1. Statutory Damages. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant the sum of Nineteen Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($19,500.00) 7 8 9 ($9,500.00) on Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2. Costs. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendants the sum of Six 10 11 Hundred Thirty Nine Dollars and Sixty Five Cents ($639.65) as costs of suit. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED. 14 15 16 DATED: October 29, 2014 17 18 19 20 21 _______________________________ Honorable André Birotte Jr. U.S. District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -2- [proposed] FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.