Leonard J. Porto III v. City of Laguna Beach et al, No. 8:2012cv00501 - Document 52 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 50 by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS ORDERED: 1. All federal claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice but for the claim against the City o f Laguna Beach and John Pieteg, in his official capacity, challenging the durational residency requirement for utilizing the Alternative Sleeping Location ("ASL"). 2. The state law claim brought under the California Public Records Act is DISMISSED without prejudice. (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Leonard J. Porto III v. City of Laguna Beach et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LEONARD J. PORTO, III, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. SACV 12-00501-DOC (PLA) ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the 19 amended complaint, the motion to dismiss, and all of the records and 20 files herein, and has conducted a de novo review of that portion of 21 the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 22 to which objections were filed. The Court accepts and adopts the 23 findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation. 24 IT IS ORDERED: 25 1. All federal claims against all defendants are dismissed with 26 prejudice but for the claim against the City of Laguna Beach and John 27 Pieteg, in his official capacity, challenging the durational residency 28 requirement for utilizing the Alternative Sleeping Location (“ASL”). Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. The state law claim brought under the California Public Records Act is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3 4 Dated: May 21, 2013 5 6 ______________________________ David O. Carter United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
