Raymond Baldhosky v. Ramada Maingate at the Park et al
Filing
31
JUDGMENT pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 68 30 by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment shall be entered against Defendant GARR PROPERTIES, INC., and in favor of Plaintiff RAYMOND BALDHOSKY, in the amount of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), for all damages, claims, costs, expenses, and attorneys fees asserted by Plaintiff as against all named Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
RAYMOND BALDHOSKY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15
RAMADA MAINGATE AT THE
PARK, the d/b/a of GARR
PROPERTIES, INC., et al.,
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
) Case No.: SACV12-0353 DOC (RNBx)
)
) JUDGMENT PURSUANT FED. R.
) CIV. P. 68 [30]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT PURSUANT FED. R. CIV. P. 68
Case No.: SACV12-0353 DOC (RNBx)
1
1
Pursuant to the Offer of Judgment (Fed. R. Civ. P. 68) of Defendant GARR
2
PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a RAMADA MAINGATE AT THE PARK, and Plaintiff
3
RAYMOND BALDHOSKY’s Notice of Acceptance of Defendant GARR
4
PROPERTIES, INC.’s Offer of Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68, filed on
5
August 27, 2013:
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment
7
shall be entered against Defendant GARR PROPERTIES, INC., and in favor of
8
Plaintiff RAYMOND BALDHOSKY, in the amount of Seventy-Five Thousand
9
Dollars ($75,000.00), for all damages, claims, costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees
10
asserted by Plaintiff as against all named Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: August 29, 2013
THE HON. DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT PURSUANT FED. R. CIV. P. 68
Case No.: SACV12-0353 DOC (RNBx)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?