Mr Steven M Gabaldon v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
24
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow Re Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 23 : IT IS ORDERED that EAJA fees, expenses and costs are awarded to the plaintiff consisting of Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Five Dollars and Fifty Cents ($8,605.5), subject to the terms of the stipulation. (ad)
1
2
3
4
5
JIMMY O. EWENIKE, CSBN 133406
Law Offices of Jimmy Ewenike
515 West Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 210
Fullerton, CA. 92832
Telephone: (714) 773-0611
Facsimile: (714) 257-9987
E-Mail: Ewenike@yahoo.com
11
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief Civil Division
FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES, CSBN 258924
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel, Region IX
160 Spear Street, St. 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-1545
E-Mail: Francesco.benavides@ssa.gov
Telephone: (415) 977-8873
12
Attorneys for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
15
STEVEN M. GABALDON
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
)
Commissioner of Social
)
Security
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
CASE NO. CV 12-00340 GAF (DTB)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1920
22
23
Based upon the parties' concurrently filed Stipulation for
24
Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that EAJA fees,
25
expenses and costs are awarded to the plaintiff consisting of
26
Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Five Dollars and Fifty Cents
27
($8,605.5), subject to the terms of the stipulation.
28
Dated: August 20, 2013
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?