G. M. et al v. Saddleback Valley Unified School District, No. 8:2011cv01449 - Document 32 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Saddleback Valley Unified School District. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:1) Plaintiffs take nothing by reason of their Complaint; 2) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Saddleback Valley Unified School District in accordance with the Courts Order Affirming Administrative Law Judges Decision, dated August 1, 2012; See order for more information. (twdb)

Download PDF
G. M. et al v. Saddleback Valley Unified School District Doc. 32 1 Epiphany Owen (State Bar No. 211527) eowen@rutan.com 2 Joseph Larsen (State Bar No. 244506) jlarsen@rutan.com 3 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 4 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 Telephone: 714-641-5100 5 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 6 Attorneys for Defendant Saddleback Valley Unified School District 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 G.M. and R.M., a minor child by and through her mother G.M., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 SADDLEBACK VALLEY UNIFIED 15 SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. 16 Case No. SA CV 11-1449 DOC (MLGx) FINAL JUDGMENT Date Action Filed: September 22, 2011 Hearing on Briefing: Date: July 25, 2012 Time: 4:30 p.m. Location: Courtroom 9D 17 18 19 On July 25, 2012, this matter was heard before this Court, the Honorable 20 David O. Carter, United States District Court, presiding. Plaintiffs appeared through 21 their attorney of record, Drew Massey of Timothy A. Adams & Associates, APLC. 22 Defendant appeared through its attorney of record, Epiphany Owen of Rutan & 23 Tucker, LLP. 24 The Court, having considered the briefs of the parties, arguments of counsel, 25 and the administrative record, and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 27 1) Plaintiffs take nothing by reason of their Complaint; 28 2) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Saddleback Valley Unified 2132/060989-0001 3898222.1 a08/02/12 Case No. 11-cv-01449 DOC (MLGx) FINAL JUDGMENT -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 School District in accordance with the Court’s Order Affirming Administrative Law 2 Judge’s Decision, dated August 1, 2012; 3 3) Defendant Saddleback Valley Unified School District is the prevailing 4 party for purposes of the underlying administrative action and the instant appeal 5 thereof; and 6 4) This Court retains jurisdiction over the parties related to Defendant 7 Saddleback Valley Unified School District’s forthcoming Motion for Reasonable 8 Attorneys Fees. 9 10 Dated: August 6, 2012 Hon. David O. Carter Judge, United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2132/060989-0001 3898222.1 a08/02/12 Case No. 11-cv-01449 DOC (MLGx) FINAL JUDGMENT -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.