Ronald Michael Iskenderian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association et al
Filing
6
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, RE: REMOVAL TO BANKRUPTCY COURT: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why the "removed" district court action should not be remanded to this Court as having been improperly removed. (rla)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. SACV 11-01318 DOC-E
Date: September 19, 2011
Title: RONALD MICHAEL ISKENDERIAN v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, ET AL
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Julie Barrera
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NONE PRESENT
PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS):
NONE PRESENT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMOVAL TO
BANKRUPTCY COURT
Plaintiff Ronald Michael Iskenderian (“Plaintiff”) has filed with the Court a “Notice of
Removal,” seeking to remove the present case to bankruptcy court. Notice of Removal, Sep. 7, 2011.
This purported “Notice of Removal,” however, has no practical effect. With his filing of a “Notice of
Removal” to bankruptcy court, Plaintiff appears to proceed as if he believes himself to be removing a
case from state to federal court. The relationship between district court and bankruptcy court
jurisdiction, however, is not analogous to the relationship between state court and federal court
jurisdiction. A bankruptcy court and a district court are courts within the same judicial district. As the
Central District of California has held when confronted with this issue, a party cannot “remove a
lawsuit pending in federal district court to the same district court where the lawsuit is already pending.”
In Re Mitchell, 206 B.R. 204, 210-11 (C.D. Cal. 1997) (stating that interpreting the statute to allow for
this kind of removal – from a district court to a bankruptcy court within the same district – would yield
a “logically idiotic result.”). Rather, the proper procedure to be employed in requesting transfer of a
case to a bankruptcy judge is as follows: the party seeking the transfer to a bankruptcy court must file a
motion in front of the district court requesting that the district judge refer the lawsuit to the bankruptcy
court for further proceedings. Id. In this case, Plaintiff has made no such motion. All that has been
filed is a procedurally meaningless “Notice of Removal” – a document with no practical effect.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause why the “removed” district court action
MINUTES FORM 11 DOC
CIVIL - GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk _____
Page 1 of 2
should not be remanded to this Court as having been improperly removed.
The Clerk shall serve a copy of this minute order on counsel for all parties in this action
MINUTES FORM 11 DOC
CIVIL - GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk _____
Page 2 of 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
