Robert Ritchie v. Argent Mortgage Company LLC et al
Filing
61
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker,REGARDING LACK OF PROSECUTION: The Court considers good faith participation in mandatory loan modification settlement proceedings to be part of the required prosecution of this matte r. As set forth above, Plaintiff has failed to participate in those proceedings. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than May 11, 2012, as to why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The failure to respond by that date will result in this matter being administratively closed. (rla) Modified on 5/1/2012 (rla).
<![CDATA[
____________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 11-1106-JST (ANx)
Title: Robert Ritchie v. Argent Mortgage Co. LLC, et al.
Date: May 1, 2012
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE
Ellen Matheson
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
Not Present
PROCEEDINGS:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
Not Present
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING LACK
OF PROSECUTION
On October 18, 2011, the Court vacated the Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss,
ordered the parties to engage in loan modification settlement proceedings, and otherwise stayed
this action pending completion of such proceedings and the filing of a joint status report
informing the Court as to the outcome. (Doc. 37.) On April 23, 2012, Defendants filed a status
report informing the Court that, despite six loan modification readiness conferences before this
Court, Plaintiff has failed to provide to Defendants all documents necessary to evaluate his loan
modification. (Doc. 60 at 2.) Defendants further notified the Court that Plaintiff’s counsel
advised Defendants’ counsel that he has not received the necessary loan modification documents
from Plaintiff. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff’s failure to provide the necessary documents has required
postponement of the loan modification settlement conference on two occasions. (Id. at 2.) As a
result, the Attorney Settlement Officer directed counsel to notify the Court that the loan
modification settlement proceedings have concluded without resolution. (Id. at 3.)
The Court considers good faith participation in mandatory loan modification settlement
proceedings to be part of the required prosecution of this matter. As set forth above, Plaintiff has
failed to participate in those proceedings. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in
writing no later than May 11, 2012, as to why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of
prosecution. The failure to respond by that date will result in this matter being administratively
closed.
Initials of Preparer: enm
______________________________________________________________________________
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
