Dionisie Goia et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
18
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff s shall take nothing from defendant Wells Fargo; and 3. As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit motions to tax costs and to recover attorneys fees. (twdb)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
CASE NO.: 8:11-cv-01064-CJC -RNB
DIONISIE GOIA, an individual;
DANIELA GOIA, an individual,
[Assigned to the Hon. Cormac J. Carney]
Plaintiffs,
v.
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO
WELLS FARGO BANK
SOUTHWEST, NA F/K/A
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB
F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
FSB; NDEX WEST, LLC; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On September 14, 2011, this Court entered an Order granting, without leave
to amend, the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint filed by defendant WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A.,
f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB (“Wells
95451/000893/00228894-1
1
CASE NO.: 8:11-CV-01064-CJC -RNB
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Fargo”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In
accordance with that Order:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1.
Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed with prejudice;
2.
Plaintiff s shall take nothing from defendant Wells Fargo; and
3.
As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit motions to
tax costs and to recover attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
9
10
Dated: Septmeber 16, 2011
11
THE HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
95451/000893/00228894-1
2
CASE NO.: 8:11-CV-01064-CJC -RNB
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
