U.S. Energy Technologies, Inc. v. Deco Lighting Inc et al
Filing
51
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, re Stipulation to Dismiss 50 : 1. US Light's claims asserted against Deco in the above-referenced action are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Deco's counterclaims asserted against US Light i n the above-referenced action are dismissed with prejudice. Deco may reassert its patent invalidity, noninfringement and unenforceability counterclaims in the event US Light were to initiate future patent litigation against Deco. 3. There shall be no award to any of the Settling Parties of costs, attorneys' fees and/or other expenses of litigation. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)
<![CDATA[
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
U.S. ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(DBA U.S. LIGHTING TECH.),
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. SACV 11-329 JST (RNBx)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
15
16
DECO LIGHTING, INC., et al.,
17
18
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19691.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
Based on the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by and between Plaintiff U.S. Energy
2
Technologies, Inc. (d/b/a U.S. Lighting Tech.) (“US Light”) and Defendant Deco Lighting,
3
Inc. (“Deco”) (collectively the “Settling Parties”), which Stipulation of Dismissal was
4
entered into pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement, it is hereby ordered that:
1.
5
6
US Light’s claims asserted against Deco in the above-referenced action are
dismissed with prejudice.
2.
7
Deco’s counterclaims asserted against US Light in the above-referenced action
8
are dismissed with prejudice. Deco may reassert its patent invalidity, noninfringement and
9
unenforceability counterclaims in the event US Light were to initiate future patent litigation
10
against Deco.
11
3.
12
There shall be no award to any of the Settling Parties of costs, attorneys’ fees
and/or other expenses of litigation.
13
14
Dated: September 26, 2011
15
16
By:
17
18
JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
United States District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19691.1
[2]4064.1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
