Yassir Fazaga et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, No. 8:2011cv00301 - Document 129 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States of America, Barbara Walls, J Stephen Tidwell, Kevin Armstrong, Pat Rose, Paul Allen, Robert Mueller, Steven M Martinez. Related to: Order Granting Motion for Issuance of Partial Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b, 128 . (rla)

Download PDF
Yassir Fazaga et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al Doc. 129 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SOUTHERN DIVISION 13 14 15 YASSIR FAZAGA, ALI UDDIN MALIK, YASSER ABDELRAHIM, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 20 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ET AL., Defendants. 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 8:11-cv-00301-CJC(VBKx) PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) 23 In accordance with its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Issuance of Partial 24 25 26 Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) issued concurrently herewith, the Court issues judgment as follows: 27 28 /// -1- Dockets.Justia.com 1 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants United States of America; the 2 Federal Bureau of Investigation; Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of 3 Investigation, in his official capacity; and Steven M. Martinez, Assistant Director 4 in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Los Angeles Division, in his official 5 capacity, on all Plaintiffs’ claims. 6 7 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants J. Stephen Tidwell, Barbara 8 Walls, Pat Rose, Kevin Armstrong, and Paul Allen in their individual capacities on 9 Plaintiffs’ First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and 10 Eleventh Causes of Action. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 DATED: December 3, 2012 __________________________________ CORMAC J. CARNEY 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.