Blizzard Entertainment Inc v. Michael Vankuipers et al
Filing
31
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney in favor of Blizzard Entertainment Inc against John Roe Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 29 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (rla)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969)
mem@msk.com
JILL P. RUBIN (SBN 240019)
jpr@msk.com
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90064-1683
Telephone: (310) 312-2000
Facsimile: (310) 312-3100
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
a Delaware Corporation,
Blizzard,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
3984363.1
28
v.
MICHAEL VANKUIPERS a/k/a
“Perma” or “Permaphrost,” an
individual; MICHAEL SIMPSON a/k/a
Matt Cooper, a/k/a Cranix” and
“Cranyx”; JOHN ROE a/k/a
“linuxawesome” and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive.
Defendants.
CASE NO. SACV 10-1495-CJC
(MLGx)
The Honorable Cormac J. Carney
[PROPOSED] CONSENT
JUDGMENT
1
Plaintiff Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. (“Blizzard”) and Defendant John Roe
2
a/k/a “linuxawesome” (“Defendant”) having entered into a Stipulation for Entry of
3
Judgment and the Court having entered an Order thereon,
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
6
1.
Blizzard alleges that Defendant engaged in copyright infringement,
7
inducement to infringe copyrights, contributory copyright infringement, vicarious
8
copyright infringement, breach of contract, and intentional interference with
9
contractual relations.
10
11
2.
Defendant and all persons acting under Defendant’s direction or
12
control (including but not limited to his agents, representatives and employees),
13
shall, whether in the United States, Peru or any other country, immediately and
14
permanently cease and desist from:
15
16
A.
infringing Blizzard’s copyrighted works, including without limitation,
17
the development, sale and/or distribution of software products
18
designed to modify or hack StarCraft II or any other of Blizzard’s
19
copyrighted works (the “Contested Software”) (the Contested
20
Software shall include, without limitation, the “Open Source External
21
Map Hack for SC2 1.1”);
22
23
B.
24
inducing or contributing to third party infringements of Blizzard’s
copyrighted works;
25
26
3984363.1
intentionally interfering with Blizzard’s contracts with players; and
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
C.
D.
violating the StarCraft II End User License Agreement and Battle.net
28
Terms of Use.
1
1
2
3
3.
Defendant shall take down the Contested Software and any colorable
copy thereof, hosted at any domain, address, location, or ISP within his control.
4
5
6
4.
Defendant shall deliver to Blizzard all copies of materials that infringe
or violate any of Blizzard’s rights described herein.
7
8
9
10
5.
Defendant shall provide Blizzard with an accounting of any and all
sales of products or services that infringe or violate any of Blizzard’s rights
described herein.
11
12
6.
Defendant shall destroy all digital files representing any Contested
13
Software that are currently in his possession, custody, or control. Defendant shall
14
provide Blizzard with a sworn statement within five days after the entry of the
15
Consent Judgment certifying his compliance with this provision.
16
17
7.
Absent the prior written consent of Blizzard or its designee,
18
Defendant shall not publicly release, distribute, sell, transfer or give away, for
19
consideration or otherwise, any software, source code, object code, technology,
20
domain name(s), trademark(s), brand(s), goodwill or any other property of any
21
kind, in whole or in part, which is in any way related to the Contested Software,
22
including without limitation, by posting such materials on an internet web page or
23
by offering such materials over any peer-to-peer or file-trading network or any
24
other medium.
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
3984363.1
8.
Any company or entity that Defendant owns or operates in the future
shall also comply with the provisions of this Consent Judgment.
28
2
1
9.
Defendant irrevocably and fully waives notice of entry of the Consent
2
Judgment and notice and service of the entered Consent Judgment and
3
understands, confirms, and agrees that violation of the Consent Judgment will
4
expose Defendant to all penalties provided by law, including contempt of Court.
5
6
10.
Defendant irrevocably and fully waives any and all rights to appeal
7
the Consent Judgment, to have it vacated or set aside, to seek or obtain a new trial
8
thereon, or otherwise to attack in any way, directly or collaterally, its validity or
9
enforceability.
10
11
11.
Nothing contained in the Consent Judgment shall limit the right of
12
Blizzard to seek relief, including without limitation, damages, for any and all
13
infringements by Defendant of the Blizzard’s copyrighted works occurring after
14
the date Defendant executes the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment.
15
16
17
12.
This Consent Judgment shall be deemed to have been served upon
Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court.
18
19
13.
The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this
20
Consent Judgment and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(a), the
21
Court directs immediate entry of this Consent Judgment against Defendant.
22
23
14.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such
24
further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or
25
appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Consent Judgment.
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
3984363.1
28
3
1
2
Dated: August 19, 2011
3
The Honorable United States District
Judge Cormac J. Carney
4
Submitted by:
5
DATED: August 18, 2011
6
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
MARC E. MAYER
JILL P. RUBIN
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ Marc E. Mayer
Marc E. Mayer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
3984363.1
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?