Trowa Vu Bui v. Kelly Harrington
Filing
48
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 44 . Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)
<![CDATA[
1
O
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TROWA VU BUI,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
KELLY HARRINGTON,
Warden,
16
Respondent.
17
___________________________
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. SA CV 10-638-DSF (SP)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended
19 Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States
20 Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those
21 portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the
22 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the
24 First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
8/5/13
25
26 DATED: _________________
27
28
______________________________
HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
