Calcar et al v. The California Cars Initiative et al, No. 8:2007cv00723 - Document 189 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (1) Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs... (2) Defendants are the prevailing parties on Plaintiffs' Complaint. Costs are to be awarded by application to the Clerk of the Court. (3) Any request for attorney's fees will be separately considered upon a properly noticed motion. (4) The Clerk is ordered to enter this judgment forthwith. (db)

Download PDF
Calcar et al v. The California Cars Initiative et al Doc. 189 William C. Rooklidge (SBN 134483) 1 HOWREY LLP 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1700 2 Irvine, CA 92614-2559 Telephone: (949) 721-6900 3 Facsimile: (949) 721-6910 E-mail: rooklidgew@howrey.com 4 E-mail: cotef@howrey.com 5 Bobby A. Ghajar (SBN 198719) HOWREY LLP 6 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California 90071 7 Telephone: (213) 892-1800 Facsimile: (213) 892-2300 8 E-mail: ghajarb@howrey.com E-mail: mooree@howrey.com 9 Attorneys for Defendants 10 The California Cars Initiative, Inc. and Felix Kramer 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SOUTHERN DIVISION 15 16 CALCAR, INC., a California ) Case No. SACV07-723-AG(JWJx) Corporation; and AMERICAN CALCAR, ) 17 INC., a Delaware corporation, ) FINAL JUDGMENT ) 18 Plaintiffs, ) ) 19 vs. ) ) 20 THE CALIFORNIA CARS INITIATIVE, ) INC., an unknown business entity; and ) 21 FELIX KRAMER, an individual, ) ) 22 Defendants. ) ) 23 ) 24 25 The Court, having considered the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, 26 all responses thereto, and oral argument; having taken the matter under submission on 27 September 8, 2008; and having issued an Order dated October 8, 2008 granting 28 HOWREY LLP DM_US:21523992_1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Defendants The California Cars Initiative and Felix Kramer’s (“Defendants”) motion 2 for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs Calcar, Inc. and American Calcar, Inc.’s. 3 (“Plaintiffs”) claims; 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 5 1. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs on each 6 claim asserted by Plaintiffs in their Complaint, specifically, (1) federal trademark 7 infringement; (2) false designation of origin; (3) California trademark dilution; (4) 8 common law trademark infringement and unfair competition; and (5) California unfair 9 competition. 10 2. Defendants are the prevailing parties on Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Costs are to 11 be awarded by application to the Clerk of the Court. 12 3. Any request for attorney’s fees will be separately considered upon a 13 properly noticed motion. 14 4. The Clerk is ordered to enter this judgment forthwith. 15 16 17 18 Dated: November 04, 2008 Honorable Andrew J. Guilford 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 HOWREY LLP 27 28 -2DM_US:21523992_1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.