-JWJ Intamin Ltd v. Magnetar Technologies Corp et al, No. 8:2004cv00511 - Document 217 (C.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT on Order Granting Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 216 by Judge Gary A. Feess. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1) The motion is GRANTED. 2) The Court's 12/28/2009 order 189 in favor of Magnetar, and against Intamin, in the amount of $819,646.03, is enforceable as entered. (csi)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JWJ Intamin Ltd v. Magnetar Technologies Corp et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Doc. 217 John B. Sganga, Jr. (Bar No. 116211) jsganga@kmob.com David G. Jankowski (Bar No. 205634) djankowski@kmob.com Christopher L. Ross (Bar No. 228376) cross@kmob.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: 949-760-0404 Facsimile: 949-760-9502 John W. Holcomb (Bar No. 172121) jholcomb@kmob.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 700 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone: 951-781-9231 Facsimile: 949-760-9502 Attorneys for Defendant MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 WESTERN DIVISION 16 INTAMIN, LTD., a Maryland corporation, 17 18 v. Plaintiff, 20 MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., a Nevada corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 21 Defendant. 22 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 19 ) Civil Action No. ) 8:04-CV-00511 GAF (JWJx) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Hon. Gary A. Feess 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 This Court, having considered the Motion of Defendant MAGNETAR 2 TECHNOLOGIES CORP. for Entry of Final Judgment (the “Motion”) and the 3 papers filed in support thereof, the papers in opposition to the Motion (if any) 4 filed by Plaintiff INTAMIN, LTD. (“Intamin”), the oral argument of counsel (if 5 any), and the pleadings and other documents of record, hereby concludes that 6 the above-captioned civil action is now in condition for the entry of Final 7 Judgment. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as 8 follows: 9 1. The Motion is GRANTED. 10 2. This Court’s December 28, 2009 “Order Re: Magnetar’s 11 Application for Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs” [Dkt. No. 189] in favor 12 of Magnetar, and against Intamin, in the amount of $819,646.03, is enforceable 13 as entered. 14 15 DONE AND ORDERED, at Los Angeles, California, this 17th day of February, 2011. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 10492416_1 013111 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
