Jaime Yepez Lopez v. G J Janda et al, No. 5:2013cv00316 - Document 13 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Gary A. Feess Re Report and Recommendation 11 : The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) granting Respondents Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jaime Yepez Lopez v. G J Janda et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIME YEPEZ LOPEZ, 12 Petitioner, V. 13 14 G. J. JANDA, et al., 15 Case No. EDCV 13-316-GAF (OP) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondents. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on 18 file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and 19 Petitioner’s Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 20 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The 21 Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, 22 I/I 23 I/I 24 I/I 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and 2 Recommendation; and (2) granting Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition as 3 untimely; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and 4 dismissing this action with prejudice. 5 6 7 DATED: 8 9 10 11 Prepared by: 12 13 HONORABLE OSWALD I’ARADA 14 United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
