Encarnacion Iniguez v. Young Home Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
10
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 ENCARNACION INIGUEZ,
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v.
)
)
YOUNG HOME MORTGAGE LLC, )
et al.
)
)
)
Defendants. )
________________________ )
Case No.
EDCV 13-00216-JGB (SPx)
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
17
18
On January 2, 2013, Plaintiff Encarnacion Iniguez
19
filed a complaint in state court against Defendants Young
20
Home Mortgage, LLC ("Young"), Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
21
N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), National City Mortgage,
22
("National"), PNC Mortgage ("PNC"), and fictitious
23
entities (collectively, "Defendants").
(Not. of Removal,
24
Exh. 1, Doc. No. 1.)
On February 1, 2013, Defendants
25
removed the action to this Court.
(Not. of Removal.)
26
On February 8, 2013, National and PNC filed a motion
27
to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint.
(Doc. No. 4.)
28
Court granted the motion on March 12, 2013 due to
The
1 Plaintiff's failure to oppose and entered judgment
2 dismissing PNC and National from the complaint without
3 prejudice.
4
(Doc. Nos. 7-8.)
On July 12, 2013, the Court issued an order to show
5 cause by July 23, 2013 why the case should not be
6 dismissed for lack of prosecution as to the remaining
7 Defendants.
(Doc. No. 9.)
The Court put Plaintiff on
8 notice that failure to respond to the order would be
9 deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
(Id.)
As
10 of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not responded to
11 the order to show cause, nor has he filed the required
12 proofs of service.
13
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's
14 Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court orders that such
15 judgment be entered.
16
17
18
8/13/13
Dated:
19
JESUS G. BERNAL
United States District Judge
20
21
22
JS-6
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
