Ashley Hanson v. Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before August 20, 2013, Plaintiff must (a) show good cause in writing why her initial portion of the Joint Stipulation was not provided to Defendant in a time ly fashion, and why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Case Management Order; or (b) comply with the Case Management Order by providing Defendant with the initial portion of the Joint Stipulati on. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to show good cause or failure to provide the initial portion of the Joint Stipulation as ordered will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with Court orders. (lmh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY HANSON, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 ) Case No. EDCV 12-2175-SVW (JEM) ) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ) ) ) ) ) ) On December 26, 2012, the Court issued a Case Management Order, in which 18 ,the parties were ordered to “cooperate in preparing the Joint Stipulation, and sanctions 19 may be imposed for any failure to cooperate.” On May 23, 2013, Defendant filed a 20 Notice of Non-Receipt of Initial Portion of Joint Stipulation which stated that the Plaintiff 21 was unavailable after attempts to by telephone and mail. On May 31, 2013, Defendant 22 filed an Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File Parties’ Joint Stipulation 23 (“Extension”) to extend dates for exchange of the portions, response and reply between 24 the parties. On June 3, 2013, the Court granted the Extension. On July 25, 2013, 25 Defendant filed a Second Notice of Non-Receipt of Initial Portion of Joint Stipulation, 26 which states that the Plaintiff has failed to provide her initial portion of the Joint 27 Stipulation, has not properly prosecuted this matter and has not complied with the 28 1 1 2 Court’s Case Management Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before August 20, 2013, 3 Plaintiff must (a) show good cause in writing why her initial portion of the Joint 4 Stipulation was not provided to Defendant in a timely fashion, and why this action 5 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Case 6 Management Order; or (b) comply with the Case Management Order by providing 7 Defendant with the initial portion of the Joint Stipulation. 8 Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to show good cause or failure to provide the 9 initial portion of the Joint Stipulation as ordered will result in a recommendation that this 10 action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with Court orders. 11 12 13 DATED: August 6, 2013 14 JOHN E. MCDERMOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?