Peter E. Lindamood v. Michael J. Astrue
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT, (1) Plaintiffs request for an order directing the immediate payment of benefits or remanding the case for further proceedings is DENIED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is GRANTED; and (3) judgment is herebyentered in the Commissioner's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
1
FILED - SOUTHERN DIVISION
2
C[LERI:•.-~~.?.:..'?.1.~~.':~~!_9.~UlRT
3
AUG- 6 2UIJ
4
-·
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
"·-·~----~.---··-~-,.··-~
BY
5
·-··~-··-~·· .-.--·~
''
-.-
CALIFO:-:r~JA
S~_ _ _ _ _DEPUTY
JS-6
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 PETER E. LINDAMOOD,
Plaintiff,
11
12
Case No. EDCV 12-01684 AN
JUDGMENT
v.
13
CAROLYN W. COLVIN ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
14 SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
15
Defendant.
16
17
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum and order, it is hereby
18 ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT, (1) Plaintiffs request for an order directing the
19 immediate payment of benefits or remanding the case for further proceedings is
20 DENIED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's
21
final decision and dismissing the action is GRANTED; and (3) judgment is hereby
22 entered in the Commissioner's favor.
23
24 DATED:
25
26
27
28
August 6, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?