Ophelia Roop v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to allege any cognizable claim. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the Courts order to show cause by May 21, 2012. (see document for details) (mu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. EDCV 12-00640-CJC(FFMx)
Date: May 11, 2012
Title: OPHELIA GEORGIEV ROOP v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., ET AL.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Michelle Urie
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
None Present
N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants asserting seventeen causes of action
relating to the non-judicial foreclosure process initiated on her property. Based upon a
review of the complaint, it appears that Plaintiff’s claims are not cognizable causes of
action, inadequately pled, and/or based on theories of liability that are not viable.
Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be
dismissed for failure to allege any cognizable claim. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to
the Court’s order to show cause by May 21, 2012. Defendants shall then have until May
28, 2012 to file a response. This matter will be decided on the papers without any
hearing.
jsk
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk MU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?