Halbert Dean Sarpy v. Rialto Police Dept et al, No. 5:2012cv00426 - Document 48 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Gary A. Feess Re Report and Recommendation 45 : Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen days of this Order. (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Halbert Dean Sarpy v. Rialto Police Dept et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HALBERT DEAN SARPY, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. JAVIER PULIDO, et al., Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ED CV 12-426-GAF (SP) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended 19 Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 20 Magistrate Judge. Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report 21 within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of 22 the Magistrate Judge. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied. 24 Defendants are ordered to answer the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen 25 days of this Order. 26 27 DATED: June 11, 2013 28 ______________________________ HONORABLE GARY A. FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
