Lynda Klimpel v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
17
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation for Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). **See Judgment for details.** (ch)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
KATHERINE R. LOO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
California State Bar 162029
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 977-8958
Fax: (415) 744-8915
Email: Katherine.Loo@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
13
14
15
16
LYNDA KLIMPEL,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
) No. EDCV 11-01612-PLA
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation for Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within
Judgment of Remand.
///
-1-
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
2
above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social
3
Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation for Remand.
4
5
DATED: May 1, 2012
6
7
_______________________________________
PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Presented by:
16
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
17
18
19
20
21
22
/s/ Katherine R. Loo
KATHERINE R. LOO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
23
24
Attorneys for Defendant
25
26
27
28
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
