-OP Chanel Lacroix v. Time Warner Entertainment Company LP et al, No. 5:2011cv01350 - Document 23 (C.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Clerk of Court, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 21 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is a final judgment for purposes of Rule 54(a), F.R.Cv.P. It shall be entered pursuant to Rule 58, F.R.Cv.P., and served upon the parties. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-OP Chanel Lacroix v. Time Warner Entertainment Company LP et al Doc. 23 Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CASE NUMBER Chanel Lacroix, an individual EDCV 11-01350-VAP -(OPx) PLAINTIFF(S) v. Time Warner, Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION DEFENDANT(S). THE COURT having been advised by Counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled. However, to date, counsel have: G failed to file the appropriate stipulation for dismissal, or G failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal of Action by reason of: G Other: See ECF No. 21, Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is a final judgment for purposes of Rule 54(a), F.R.Cv.P. It shall be entered pursuant to Rule 58, F.R.Cv.P., and served upon the parties. Clerk, U. S. District Court 5/14/12 Date CV-85 (07/97) By Jim Holmes, Relief CRD Deputy Clerk ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
