Terrell Law v. Kathleen Allison
Filing
22
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H. King, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 19 (san)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
TERRELL LAW,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
-------------
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 11-0097-GHK (JEM)
ORDER ACCEPTING
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on
18
file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and
20
Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the ultimate
21
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
22
At the time the Amended Report and Recommendation was filed, the Ninth Circuit
23
had not yet decided whether a showing of actual innocence could overcome the AEDPA
24
statute of limitations. (See Amended Report and Recommendation at 8.) On August 2,
25
2011, after rehearing en banc, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Lee v. Lampert, _
26
F.3d _' 2011 WL 3275947 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 2011), in which it held that there is an actual
27
innocence exception to the AEDPA statute of limitations.
28
kl at *3.
The Court concurs with
1
the analysis set forth in the Amended Report and Recommendation that Petitioner has
2
failed to show that the actual innocence exception applies in his case.
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that
Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED:
7
~t.1+-Jl~~~/II__
7
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
