Anthony Grissom Sr v. Riverside County Jail et al, No. 5:2010cv01727 - Document 73 (C.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ORDERED that: judgment be entered in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiffs failure-to-protect claim; and the remainder of the action be dismissed without prejudice. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 69 (vm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Anthony Grissom Sr v. Riverside County Jail et al Doc. 73 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ANTHONY GRISSOM, 13 14 vs. Plaintiff, 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY JAIL, et al., 16 Defendants. __________________________ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ED CV 10-1727 PA (MRW) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: judgment be entered in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff’s failure-to-protect claim; and the remainder of the action be dismissed without prejudice. 26 27 DATE: October 17, 2012 28 ___________________________________ HON. PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
