Altheia Taylor v. County of San Bernardino Human Services
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Margaret M. Morrow for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 32 (rrey)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALTHEIA TAYLOR,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et
al,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. EDCV 09-01829-MMM (MAN)
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First
19
Amended Complaint, defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended
20
Complaint (“Motion”), all of the records herein, the Report and
21
Recommendation
22
plaintiff’s Objections.
23
those matters to which Objections have been stated in writing.
24
completed its review, the Court accepts and adopts the Report.
of
United
States
Magistrate
Judge
(“Report”),
and
The Court has conducted a de novo review of
Having
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that:
the Motion is granted pursuant to Rule
27
12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the First Amended
28
Complaint is dismissed as follows:
1
(1)
Claims One through Nine are dismissed with leave to amend;
2
3
4
(2)
Claims Ten through Twelve are dismissed without leave to
amend and without prejudice to their reassertion in state court; and
5
6
(3)
Plaintiff is granted leave to amend to file and serve a
7
Second Amended Complaint, consistent with this Order and the Report,
8
within thirty (30) days of this Order.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
DATED:
September 30, 2011.
13
14
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?