GS Holistic, LLC v. Zee Smoke Shop et al, No. 2:2022cv06869 - Document 23 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff on all claims, and the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $151,038.55 (statutory damages of $150,000.00 plus costs of $1,038.55). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GS Holistic, LLC v. Zee Smoke Shop et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:22-cv-06869-JFW-PVCx Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT ZEE SMOKE SHOP d/b/a ZEE SMOKE SHOP, EIAD F SIF, and ELIAS SAIF, Defendants, 17 18 19 The Court has before it the Plaintiff GS HOLISTIC, LLC’s Motion for Default 20 21 Final Judgment against All Defendants, ZEE SMOKE SHOP d/b/a ZEE SMOKE 22 SHOP, EIAD F SIF, and ELIAS SAIF (collectively, “Defendants”). Having 23 considered the Plaintiff’s Motion and all documents and evidence attached thereto, 24 25 and the Court being fully advised, and good cause shown: 26 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 entered in favor of the Plaintiff on all claims, and the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $151,038.55 (statutory damages of $150,000.00 plus costs 3 4 of $1,038.55). 5 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 8 Defendants, their agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, 9 successor companies, related companies, and all persons acting in concern or 10 11 participation with it are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon 12 the Stündenglass Marks directly or contributorily, in any manner, including but not 13 limited to: 14 15 (a) Import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, use, 16 acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 17 distribution, storage, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, 18 19 marketing advertising or promotion of the counterfeit Stündenglass product 20 identified in the complaint and any other unauthorized Stündenglass product, 21 counterfeit, copy or colorful imitation thereof; 22 23 24 (b) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or entity in performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs (a) above. 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1118, the Defendants, at their cost, deliver to the Plaintiff for destruction 2 1 2 all products, accessories, labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, advertisements, and other material in their possession, custody or control bearing any 3 4 of the Stündenglass Marks. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: July 3, 2023 ____________________________ United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
