Theresa Brooke v. Sapphire Investments LLC, No. 2:2022cv04692 - Document 71 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT 58 65 by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Sapphire Investments LLC and against Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. 2. Defendant shall be awarded fees and costs as provided by law, e.g. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 28 USC § 1920. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Theresa Brooke v. Sapphire Investments LLC Doc. 71 JS-6 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No. CV 22-4692-GW-RAOx 6 7 THERESA BROOKE, a married woman dealing with her sole and separate claim, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 FINAL JUDGMENT SAPPHIRE INVESTMENTS LLC, a California limited liability company, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 In accordance with the Court’s Supplemental Ruling on Defendant Sapphire 15 Investments LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 58), Order on 16 Defendant Sapphire Investments LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket 17 No. 65) and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54, 56(f) and 58(b)(2), 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that : 19 1. 20 and against Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. 21 22 Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Sapphire Investments LLC 2. Defendant shall be awarded fees and costs as provided by law, e.g. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 28 USC § 1920. 23 24 Dated: June 12, 2023 HON. GEORGE H. WU United States District Judge 25 1 Final Judgment -- 2:22-cv-04692-GW-RAO Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
