Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 2:2017cv04146 - Document 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. On August 15, 2017, Sound View Innovations, LLC filed a First Amended Complaint alleging that Hulu, LLC (Hulu) infringed Claim 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,708,213 On February 13, 2023, Hulu filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of Claim 16 of the '213 Patent. On September 8, 2023, Hulus Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of Claim 16 of the 213 Patent was granted. Accordingly, Final Judgment is her eby entered as follows: Hulu does not infringe Claim 16 of the '213 Patent. Hulu's Sixth Counterclaim is hereby dismissed as moot without prejudice to Hulu requesting to revive its counterclaim and defenses after appeal. Because no claims remain in this action, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Hulu. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)

Download PDF
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC Doc. 1094 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 HULU, LLC, 16 Case No. LACV17-04146 JAK (PLAx) FINAL JUDGMENT JS-6 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 On August 15, 2017, Sound View Innovations, LLC (“Sound View”) filed a 2 First Amended Complaint alleging that Hulu, LLC (“Hulu”) infringed Claim 16 of 3 U.S. Patent No. 6,708,213 (the “’213 Patent”).1 On February 13, 2023, Hulu filed a 4 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of Claim 16 of the ’213 Patent. 5 On September 8, 2023, Hulu’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement 6 of Claim 16 of the ’213 Patent was granted. 7 Accordingly, Final Judgment is hereby entered as follows: 8 1. Hulu does not infringe Claim 16 of the ’213 Patent. 9 2. Hulu’s Sixth Counterclaim is hereby dismissed as moot without 10 prejudice to Hulu requesting to revive its counterclaim and defenses after appeal. 11 12 3. in favor of Hulu. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Because no claims remain in this action, the Clerk shall enter judgment Dated: September 25, 2023 15 JOHN A. KRONSTADT 16 United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Claims, defenses, and counterclaims with respect to four other patents, and with respect to all other originally asserted claims of the ’213 Patent, were voluntarily dismissed by the parties with prejudice. Final judgment that the sole asserted claim of a fifth patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,806,062, was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for lack of patentable subject matter was previously entered, and that judgment was not appealed. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.