The Bank of New York Mellon v. Christine Franz et al

Filing 5

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/13/2013. (rfi)

Download PDF
LINK: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 13-05169-BRO (VBKx) Title The Bank of New York Mellon v. Christine Franz et al Present: The Honorable Date August 23, 2013 BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL Renee Fisher Myra Ponce N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). Defendant(s) have failed to answer or present other defenses pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Section 81(c)(2). The instant case was removed to the Federal District Court on July 17, 2013. A response to the complaint within 21 days after receiving a copy of the initial pleading, 21 days after being served with the summons, or 7 days after the notice of removal is filed. See Rule 81(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff can satisfy this order to show cause by one of the following: 1) An answer/response by the following defendants: Steven Franz and Christine Franz; or 2) Plaintiff can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated on the Defendant and by seeking entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or by dismissing the complaint as to these defendant(s). Plaintiff(s) must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?