GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Garman Printing Co Inc
Filing
14
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(B) by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs shall have, and the Clerk is hereby ordered to enter, the following JUDGMENTagainst Defendant: (1) D amages in the amount of $1,477,952.49; (2) Attorneys fees in the amount of $33,159.05 pursuant to Local Rule55-3; (3) Costs of this action in the amount of $882.05; and (4) Post-judgment interest as permitted by statute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
13
GCIU-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT
FUND AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE GCIU-EMPLOYER
RETIREMENT FUND,
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
16
GARMAN PRINTING CO., INC.,
17
18
19
20
21
22
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV13-03920-MWF
(MANx)
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 55(B)
23
24
25
__________________________________________________________________
1
1
Defendant Garman Printing Co., Inc., having failed to answer or otherwise
2
respond to the Complaint in this action and its Default having been duly entered by
3
the Clerk,
4
NOW, upon the Motion of Plaintiffs and good cause appearing therefore,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs
6
7
shall have, and the Clerk is hereby ordered to enter, the following JUDGMENT
against Defendant:
1.
Damages in the amount of $1,477,952.49;
2.
Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $33,159.05 pursuant to Local Rule
8
9
10
11
55-3;
3.
Costs of this action in the amount of $882.05; and
4.
Post-judgment interest as permitted by statute.
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: August 27, 2013
_________________
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
__________________________________________________________________
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?