GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Garman Printing Co Inc

Filing 14

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(B) by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs shall have, and the Clerk is hereby ordered to enter, the following JUDGMENTagainst Defendant: (1) D amages in the amount of $1,477,952.49; (2) Attorneys fees in the amount of $33,159.05 pursuant to Local Rule55-3; (3) Costs of this action in the amount of $882.05; and (4) Post-judgment interest as permitted by statute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 GCIU-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT FUND AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GCIU-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT FUND, 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. 16 GARMAN PRINTING CO., INC., 17 18 19 20 21 22 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV13-03920-MWF (MANx) JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(B) 23 24 25 __________________________________________________________________ 1 1 Defendant Garman Printing Co., Inc., having failed to answer or otherwise 2 respond to the Complaint in this action and its Default having been duly entered by 3 the Clerk, 4 NOW, upon the Motion of Plaintiffs and good cause appearing therefore, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiffs 6 7 shall have, and the Clerk is hereby ordered to enter, the following JUDGMENT against Defendant: 1. Damages in the amount of $1,477,952.49; 2. Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $33,159.05 pursuant to Local Rule 8 9 10 11 55-3; 3. Costs of this action in the amount of $882.05; and 4. Post-judgment interest as permitted by statute. 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: August 27, 2013 _________________ MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 __________________________________________________________________ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?