Isabel Mata et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo and against plaintiffs Isabel Mata and Joel Mata; and Plaintiffs Isabel Mata and Joel Mata shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant Wells Fargo. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 ISABEL MATA AND JOEL MATA, CASE NO.: CV13-03771 BRO (CWx) SR., 13 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE v. [Assigned to the Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell, District Judge] 17 18 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and DOES 1-100 inclusive, 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0938/00704728-1 CV13-03771 BRO (CWX) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 On July 31, 2013, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss 2 Complaint filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (successor by merger 3 with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a 4 World Savings Bank, FSB) (“Wells Fargo”). Accordingly: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 6 1. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; 7 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 5 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo and against 8 plaintiffs Isabel Mata and Joel Mata; and 9 3. Plaintiffs Isabel Mata and Joel Mata shall take and recover nothing in 10 this action from defendant Wells Fargo. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: August 8, 2013 14 By: 15 HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0938/00704728-1 CV13-03771 BRO (CWX) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?