Christine E Bridges v. Carolyn W Colvin, No. 2:2013cv02234 - Document 32 (C.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 27 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner, entering judgment in favor of the Commissioner, and dismissing this action with prejudice. 24 (bem)

Download PDF
Christine E Bridges v. Carolyn W Colvin Doc. 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CHRISTINE E. BRIDGES, Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 16 17 18 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 13-2234-PA (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 Complaint, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the 20 Administrative Record, and all other records on file as well as 21 the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On 22 October 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R. On 23 October 31, 2014, Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff’s 24 objections. The Court has made a de novo determination of those 25 portions of the R&R to which objections have been made. As 26 Defendant notes, Plaintiff’s objections simply repeat, in cursory 27 fashion, some of the argument and statements in her motion for 28 summary judgment. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having reviewed the record, the Court concurs with and 2 accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. IT THEREFORE IS 3 ORDERED that judgment be entered AFFIRMING the decision of the 4 Commissioner, entering judgment in favor of the Commissioner, and 5 dismissing this action with prejudice. 6 7 8 DATED: November 11, 2014 9 PERCY ANDERSON U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.