Roberto Galdamez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
Filing
22
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURTORDERS by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action be dismissed without prejudice, and that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA, recover its costs pursuant to a bill of costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
JS 6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ROBERTO AND DINORA
GALDAMEZ,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
______________________________ )
Case No. CV 13-2106 DSF (Ex)
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION AND
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDERS
17
18
The Court having previously ordered plaintiffs to show cause why this action
19
should not be dismissed, Plaintiffs not having shown cause why the action should not
20
be dismissed or why they have failed to comply with Court orders or prosecute this
21
action and Plaintiffs having failed to appear at the scheduling conference,
22
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs take nothing, that
23
the action be dismissed without prejudice, and that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA,
24
recover its costs pursuant to a bill of costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920.
25
26
DATED:
August 6, 2013
27
28
DALE S. FISCHER
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
