Fidelity Mortgage Lenders Inc v. City of Pasadena et al
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING FIDELITY MORTGAGE LENDERS' MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT 30 by Judge Manuel L. Real. Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC498343 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal CV-103) (lom) Modified on 8/7/2013 (lom). (mailed 8/7/13)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP
CHARLES S. KROLIKOWSKI, CBN 185177
Charles.Krolikowski@ndlf.com
MICHAEL W. SHONAFELT, CBN 186853
Michael.Shonafelt@ndlf.com
895 Dove Street, 5th Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660
(949) 854-7000; (949) 854-7099 (Fax)
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Fidelity Mortgage Lenders, Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
N EWMEYER & D ILLION LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
FIDELITY MORTGAGE LENDERS,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF PASADENA; and DOES 1
through 50, Inclusive,
16
Defendants.
CASE NO.:
DEPT.:
JUDGE:
CV13-00603 R(Ex)
8 – 2nd Floor
Manuel L. Real
ORDER GRANTING FIDELITY
MORTGAGE LENDERS’
MOTION TO REMAND TO
STATE COURT
DATE:
TIME:
August 5, 2013
10:00 A.M.
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff Fidelity Mortgage Lenders, Inc. (“Fidelity”) filed a Motion to
Remand in the above-entitled Court on June 17, 2013. All interested parties
appeared and were represented by counsel.
22
23
After full consideration of the evidence and papers submitted by the parties,
and oral argument by counsel,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
25
26
27
28
3818496.1
[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT
1
Fidelity’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED. Accordingly, this case shall be
2
remanded to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles.
3
//
4
IT IS SO ORDERED:
5
6
Dated: _August 7, 2013____
7
_______________________________
The Honorable Manuel L. Real
8
9
N EWMEYER & D ILLION LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3818496.1
-2-
[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
