Joli Enterprises Inc v. Patriot Imaging Corporation et al
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF as follows: The following relief is warranted: and injunction against Defendant and its officers, representatives, agents, servants, and all parties in privity with Defendant, enjoining them from: Community any further acts of trademark infringement against Plaintiff; Using any term that is likely to be confused with the Patriot Imaging trade name; Representing directly or indirectly in any product is associated with or a pproved by Plaintiff, when in fact it is not; and Passing off or inducing or enabling other to sell or pass off any non-Patriot Imaging products or services as a Plaintiff's product or service or as a product or service endorsed by Plaintiff. That Plaintiff is awarded $450.00 in costs. (bp)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CENTRAL DIVISION
JOLI ENTERPRISES INC.,
A California Corporation doing
Business as PATRIOT IMAGING,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
PATRIOT IMAGING
)
CORPORATION,
)
A California Corporation;
)
And DOES 1 THROUGH 10,
)
Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
______________________________ )
CASE NO.: CV12-10459 GAF(FFMx)
[Assigned to U. S. District Judge
Gary A. Feess]
JUDGMENT
After reviewing Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant
Patriot Imaging Corporation on August 14, 2013, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN
FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF as follows:
28
-1Judgment
1
The following relief is warranted: an injunction against Defendant and its
2
officers, representatives, agents, servants, and all parties in privity with
3
Defendant, enjoining them from:
4
1. Committing any further acts of trademark infringement against Plaintiff;
5
2. Using any term that is likely to be confused with the Patriot Imaging
6
7
8
tradename;
3. Representing directly or indirectly in any product is associated with or
approved by Plaintiff, when in fact it is not; and
9
4. Passing off or inducing or enabling other to sell or pass off any non-
10
Patriot Imaging products or services as a Plaintiff’s product or service or
11
as a product or service endorsed by Plaintiff.
12
5. That Plaintiff is awarded $450.00 in costs.
13
14
Dated: August 22, 2013
15
16
17
18
By: ______________________________
Honorable Gary A. Fees
U.S. District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Judgment
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
