Efram Dori v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation et al

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 10 , the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff Efram Dori's claims against Defendants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and Circle K S tores Inc. in this action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Defendants' counter-claims against Plaintiff in this action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
Efram Dori v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Doc. 11 WILSON TURNER KOSMO LLP Robin A. Wofford (Bar No. 137919) Katherine M. McCray (Bar No. 243500) 550 West C Street, Suite 1050 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 236-9600 Facsimile: (619) 236-9669 E-mail: rwofford@wilsonturnerkosmo.com E-mail: kmccray@wilsonturnerkosmo.com JS-6 Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation (erroneously sued herein as ExxonMobil Corporation) ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON NEXT PAGE 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 15 EFRAM DORI, an Individual, Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York corporation, EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, CIRCLE K STORES, INC., a Texas corporation and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, 19 20 21 Defendants. Case No. 2:12-cv-08889-PA (VBKx) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION District Judge: Courtroom: Percy Anderson 15 Magistrate Judge: Courtroom: Victor B. Kenton 590 Complaint Filed: Trial Date: October 16, 2012 Not Set 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:12-cv-08889-PA (VBKx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION C0379003/1637279-1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 ADDITIONAL COUNSEL: 2 ARCHER NORRIS Jeffrey M. Hamerling (Bar No. 91532) jhamerling@archernorris.com Douglas C. Straus (Bar No. 96301) dstraus@archernorris.com Alissa R. Pleau-Fuller (Bar No. 258907) apleau-fuller@archernorris.com 2033 North Main Street, Suite 800 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3759 Telephone: 925.930.6600 Facsimile: 925.930.6620 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Circle K Stores Inc. (erroneously sued herein as Circle K Stores, Inc.) Thomas P. Bleau, SBN 152945 Martin R. Fox, SBN 155783 Gennady L. Lebedev, Of Counsel, SBN 179945 Megan A. Childress, SBN 266926 Troy M. Mueller, SBN 284535 BLEAU FOX, a P.L.C. 3575 Cahuenga Boulevard West, Suite 580 Los Angeles, California 90068 Telephone: (323) 874-8613 Facsimile: (323)874-1234 E-mail: tbleau@bleaufox.com E-mail: mfox@bleaufox.com E-mail: glebedev@bleaufox.com E-mail: mchildress@bleaufox.com E-mail: tmueller@bleaufox.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Efram Dori 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:12-cv-08889-PA (VBKx) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION C0379003/1637279-1 1 Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action by and between the 2 parties, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff Efram Dori’s (“Plaintiff’s”) claims 3 against Defendants ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, and 4 Circle K Stores Inc. (“Defendants”) in this action are dismissed with prejudice 5 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and Defendants’ counter-claims against 6 Plaintiff in this action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: August 8, 2013 13 ______________________________ Hon. Percy Anderson United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:12-cv-08889-PA (VBKx 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION C0379003/1637279-1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?