3M Unitek Corporation et al v. RMO Inc, No. 2:2012cv08544 - Document 20 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
3M Unitek Corporation et al v. RMO Inc Doc. 20 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 3M UNITEK CORPORATION, a CASE NO. CV12-08544 MMM (RZX) INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT corporation, Honorable Margaret M. Morrow 11 California corporation, and 3M 12 COMPANY, a Delaware 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 vs. RMO, INC., d/b/a ROCKY 16 MOUNTAIN ORTHODONTICS, a 17 Colorado corporation, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs 3M Unitek Corporation and 3M Innovative Properties Company ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant RMO, Inc. ("RMO") have reached a settlement of the above-referenced action and, pursuant to their settlement agreement, stipulate to entry of Final Judgment as follows: 1. United States Patent Nos. 6,776,614, 7,811,087 and Patent No. 7,850,451 (collectively, the "Patents-in-Suit") are duly issued, valid and enforceable; 27 28 US_ACTIVE-112788254 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. RMO's sale of customized lingual orthodontic brackets and appliances 2 manufactured by Lingaljet Othodontics ("Lingualjet") using a system of 3 3D modeling software and a virtual library of bracket bodies, which was 4 marketed as the Lingualjet system ("Accused Products") as identified and 5 described in Plaintiffs' Complaint filed in the above-captioned action, 6 infringed the Patents-in-Suit; 7 3. RMO shall immediately cease and permanently refrain from making (or the Accused Products, (b) any products that are no more than colorably 10 REED SMITH LLP having made), using, importing, offering for sale, or selling anywhere (a) 9 A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 8 different therefrom, and (c) any other products or systems that would 11 infringe any of the Patents-in-Suit. 12 4. Plaintiffs' requests for money damages are dismissed. 13 5. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action. 14 15 6. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' 16 settlement agreement, and resolve any disputes regarding compliance 17 with this Final Judgment. 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that final judgment is 21 hereby entered on the terms set forth above. 22 23 24 Dated: May 1, 2013 Margaret M. Morrow United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
