Hun Gim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court deems plaintiff's failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the motion. 4 ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUN GIM, an individual, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, M.A., business entity unknown; CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION business entity unknown;, Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 12-02295 DDP (MRWx) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. No. 4] Presently before the court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA’s 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. 21 filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion. Because Plaintiff has not 22 Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an 23 opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty- 24 one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. 25 C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. 26 “[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file 27 it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or 28 denial of the motion.” Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12. 1 The hearing on Defendant’s motion was set for April 30, 2012. 2 Plaintiff’s opposition was therefore due by April 9, 2012. As of 3 the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, or 4 any other filing that could be construed as a request for a 5 continuance.1 6 oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the 7 motion. Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiff’s failure to 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated:May 17, 2012 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 do not apply to pre-petition lawsuits by debtors. See In re Way, 229 B.R. 11, 13 (9th Cir. BAP 1998). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?