NeoMed, Inc. v. Utah Medical Products, Inc., No. 2:2012cv02196 - Document 89 (C.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, in favor of Utah Medical Products, Inc. against NeoMed, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Utah Medical Products Inc. on Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Neomed Inc.s Claim 3. This judgment is entered without prejudice to any post-judgment applications or motions for costs and/or attorneys fees. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 JS-6 2 3 NOTE CHANGES BY THE COURT 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA ANA 25 ) Case No. 2:12-cv-02196-JST (ANx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGMENT ) UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, ) INC., a Utah corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, ) INC., a Utah corporation, ) ) Counter-plaintiff, ) v. ) ) NEOMED, INC. ) ) Counter-defendant. ) ) ) ) 26 . 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NEOMED, INC. 27 28 1 1 2 This action having come before the Court, the issues having been heard and a decision having been rendered, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is 4 entered in favor of Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Utah Medical Products Inc. on 5 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Neomed Inc.’s Claim 3. 6 7 This judgment is entered without prejudice to any post-judgment applications or motions for costs and/or attorneys’ fees. 8 9 10 Dated: February 11, 2013 11 12 13 By: JUDGE JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
