Rolex Watch USA Inc v. Ted Chan et al

Filing 17

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/2/2012. (vdr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 12-01803-RGK (MANx) Date July 19, 2012 Rolex Watch USA Inc v. Ted Chan et al Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Sharon L. Williams N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None appearing None appearing Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 2, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff’s response. If plaintiff(s) files 9 Proof of TIMELY service of summons and complaint 9 Timely answer to complaint 9 Plaintiff’s application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure : Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause. CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk slw UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 12-01803-RGK (MANx) Date July 19, 2012 Rolex Watch USA Inc v. Ted Chan et al Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Sharon L. Williams N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None appearing None appearing Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before August 2, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff’s response. If plaintiff(s) files 9 Proof of TIMELY service of summons and complaint 9 Timely answer to complaint 9 Plaintiff’s application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure : Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause. CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk slw

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?