Frances T Moore v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc et al, No. 2:2012cv00856 - Document 17 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H Wu: Plaintiffs entire action against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. This is a final judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre)

Download PDF
Frances T Moore v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Doc. 17 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Robin P. Wright, Esq., SBN 150984 Email: rwright@wrightlegal.net Charles T. Meyer, Esq., SBN 264457 Email: cmeyer@wrightelgal.net 4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 280 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 477-5050; Fax: (949) 477-9200 MADE JS-6 Attorneys for Defendant, SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., and Federal National Mortgage Association 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 FRANCES T. MOORE, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 vs. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendant. ) Case No.: CV 12-00856 GW (FFMx) ) ) District Judge: Hon. George H. Wu ) ) JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 27 28 i [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Dockets.Justia.com TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, IF 1 2 ANY: 3 On March 20, 2012, Defendants’ Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., (“Saxon”) 4 and Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) (collectively referred 5 to as “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint was 6 filed. [Doc.No.12]. On April 19, 2012 the Court granted Defendants’ Motion to 7 Dismiss. [Doc. No.15]. Plaintiff has failed to timely oppose Defendants’ Motion to 8 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the Court 9 finds that the motions can be decided without oral arguments. Hence, the Court 10 11 Grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in its entirety, with prejudice and without leave to amend, and the hearing date is taken 12 off calendar. 13 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 15 Plaintiffs’ entire action against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. This is 16 a final judgment. 17 DATED: April 26, 2012 18 ________________________________ GEORGE H. WU, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ii [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.