Ruth Rosenburg v. Bank of America NA et al
Filing
15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 14 is GRANTED. Because plaintiff has failed to file oppositions or appear at scheduled hearings on two occasions, dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
JS-6
Case No.
CV 11-10597 CAS (CWx)
Title
RUTH ROSENBERG v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Present: The Honorable
Date
May 14, 2012
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
CATHERINE JEANG
Deputy Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
I.
(In Chambers:) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(filed 4/11/2012)
INTRODUCTION
On February 9, 2012, defendant Bank of America, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint in the above-captioned action. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition and
failed to appear for a hearing on defendant’s motion. The Court therefore dismissed the
case without prejudice on March 26, 2012, and granted plaintiff twenty-one (21) days
leave to amend. Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”).
On April 11, 2012, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the FAC. Plaintiff again
failed to file an opposition and again failed to appear at the hearing on defendant’s
motion. Accordingly, defendant’s motion is GRANTED. L-R 7-12 (“The failure to file
any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to
the granting or denial of the motion.”). Because plaintiff has failed to file oppositions or
appear at scheduled hearings on two occasions, dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
00
CMJ
Page 1 of 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
