Jose Adalberto Arias-Jovel v. Eric Holder et al
Filing
26
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Terry J. Hatter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 1. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, as moot, insofar as Petitioner is seeking a bond hearing af ter having had such a hearing in accordance with due process of law. 2. The petition is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction insofar as Petitioner challenging the Immigration Court's decision denying bond after his second hearing. 3. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. 20 24 (gr)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOSE ADALBERTO ARIAS-JOVEL,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
v.
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
16
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 11-10109-TJH(CW)
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition,
19
records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States
20
Magistrate Judge, Petitioner’s Objections, Respondents’ Reply, and the
21
Supplemental Report and Recommendation.
22
novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to
23
which objection has been made.
24
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
The court has engaged in a de
The court accepts the findings and
25
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
26
1.
This action is dismissed, without prejudice, as moot,
27
insofar as Petitioner is seeking a bond hearing after having had such
28
a hearing in accordance with due process of law.
1
1
2.
The petition is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of
2
jurisdiction insofar as Petitioner challenging the Immigration Court’s
3
decision denying bond after his second hearing.
4
3.
Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
5
6
DATED: August 23, 2013
7
8
TERRY J. HATTER, JR.
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
